Localism Act: RTPI Activity

17-Nov-11

Click here for the Localism Act

latest

10 minute round up of the Localism Act by Kelvin MacDonald (podcast)

Royal Assent was announced on 15 November which means we now have a Localism Act. Our note The RTPI and the Localism Act sets out what we have done to try to improve the Bill as it went through Parliament. As our President, Richard Summers says, ‘the key test of the Localism Act will be its implementation.’

DCLG have produced a plain english guide to the Localism Act (external link)

Next steps
We are already working with a range of partners on the question of guidance.
We are awaiting the regulations on CIL and neighbourhood planning; the outcomes of the local plan regulations and change of use consultations, and also seeking clarification of the position on planning fees and transitional arrangements.

Special thanks are due to our members who helped shape our policies through their invaluable expertise during our consultations.

Our response to the draft National Planning Policy Framework can be found here: high level points (pdf 72.5kb) and response to questionnaire (pdf 244kb). See our NPPF page for more information.

Myth busting: the truth about planning - campaign to set the record straight about planning and emphasise the true value of proper planning.

RTPI Briefings

 House of Lords: 19 May - 15 November 2011

House of Commons: 13 December 2010 - 18 May

Pre-publication of the Bill - before 12 December 2010

Please note: the RTPI position on some issues has evolved as developments have occured. Early briefings may not represent the most upto date RTPI stance.

RTPI information and guidance

key media responses

Ongoing work

  • We continue to be involved in discussions with Ministers and officials;
  • RTPI is represented on the CLG Planning Sounding Board;
  • We are working with a range of partners on the question of guidance;
  • RTPI members are consulted through our Localism Bill Reference Group. Email your views to localismbill@rtpi.org.uk;
  • We formally respond to Government consultations. See the list of open consultations and make a contribution;
  • Check RTPI events calendar for details of all forthcoming events for members on the Localism Bill;
  • Members are kept informed of our progress via special bulletins.
 

Author:
Sarah Lewis
Publisher:
The Royal Town Planning Institute
Date:
17-Nov-11
Categories:
Policy, Practice, RTPI News 
Sections:
News & Media , What Planning Does

This article has been read 80739 times.



Comments (1)

Presumption means that Community Right to Build no longer needed
Abraham Hill
03-Jul-11 @ 15:20PM
Abraham Hill

Well, one good thing about the Presumption is that all the clauses relating to the Community Right to Buy are now redundant. The circumstances in which the Presumption will apply are just the same as those originally envisaged for Local Housing Trusts in Open Source Planning and Strong Foundations.

Communities who might want to use the Community Right are trying to respond to a need that has not been identified at a sufficiently local level in SHMA’s, or where no mainstream housing provider is willing or able to respond to the need..
When the Community Right to Build was formally launched this time last year, the Minister used Essendon, a village in his own constituency, as a place where the community wanted to build new homes but had been persistently blocked by the council. However, there is no evidence of any such housing proposal having been submitted for planning in the last 10 years. The planning records show only 3 outright refusals for single dwellings, because they were in the green belt, and over 30 new homes have been approved. The Essendon parish councillor Margaret Titchner was quoted by the BBC as saying that “The proposal was a good idea but it could cause friction in close-knit communities. I do foresee problems". A qualified welcome, it didn’t exactly sound as if it had been a burning issue.
The SHMA 2010 accepts that communities should identify housing need in smaller villages, and the wording in the current LDF Housing Consultation offers three options to build new housing in smaller villages “if supported locally and the local infrastructure could support it.” This is a standard approach. Even applications for villages in the Green Belt could be supported in exceptional circumstances. Policy 10 Herts County Structure Plan says “ In rural areas within the Green Belt such development [to support small scale affordable housing to meet local needs] should be within settlements.”

The Minister is having us on. There are perfectly good ways of providing housing to meet very localised needs and demands. Help communities with money, and technical assistance, by all means, but this is just the kind of expensive time consuming bureaucracy that I thought this government were against. Now they have published the draft Presumption, will they please take advantage of the opportunity for some much needed simplification and cost saving.