Localism Act: RTPI Activity
17-Nov-11
-
RTPI briefings
- House of Lords
- House of Commons
- Pre-publication of the Bill
- RTPI information and guidance
- Key media responses
- Ongoing work
latest
10 minute round up of the Localism Act by Kelvin MacDonald (podcast)
Royal Assent was announced on 15 November which means we now have a Localism Act. Our note The RTPI and the Localism Act sets out what we have done to try to improve the Bill as it went through Parliament. As our President, Richard Summers says, ‘the key test of the Localism Act will be its implementation.’
DCLG have produced a plain english guide to the Localism Act (external link)
Next steps
We are already working with a range of partners on the question of guidance.
We are awaiting the regulations on CIL and neighbourhood planning; the outcomes of the local plan regulations and change of use consultations, and also seeking clarification of the position on planning fees and transitional arrangements.
Special thanks are due to our members who helped shape our policies through their invaluable expertise during our consultations.
Our response to the draft National Planning Policy Framework can be found here: high level points (pdf 72.5kb) and response to questionnaire (pdf 244kb). See our NPPF page for more information.
Myth busting: the truth about planning - campaign to set the record straight about planning and emphasise the true value of proper planning.
RTPI Briefings
House of Lords: 19 May - 15 November 2011
- The RTPI and the Localism Act (15 November);
- House of Commons Consideration of Amendments (7 November);
- Lords Report Stage Briefing (10 October);
- Civic Voice and RTPI suggested amendment to the Localism Bill: Purposes of a Neighbourhood Forum (29 June);
- Lords' Committee Stage Briefing: Transitional Arrangements (29 June);
- RTPI Issue Briefing: Enforcement (29 June);
- House of Lords' Committee Stage June/July 2011: Summary (27 June);
- House of Lords' Commitee Stage: Clause 124 Local Financial Considerations (27 June);
- RTPI Issue Briefing: Mayoral Powers (27 June);
- RTPI Briefing on the Localism Bill: Lords' Second Reading (1 June). During the debate one of the key issues we pressed in our briefing, Clause 124 (financial considerations), was raised 8 times.
- Lords’ Second Reading: Other Planning Provisions in the Bill (1 June);
- Lords’ Second Reading: Non-Planning Provisions in the Bill (1 June);
- Lords’ Second Reading: Local Financial Considerations (27 May);
- Lords’ Second Reading: Enforcement (27 May);
- Lords’ Second Reading: Neighbourhood Planning (27 May).
House of Commons: 13 December 2010 - 18 May
- RTPI Briefing: House of Commons Report Stage (13 May). The House of Commons Library Research paper contained six references to RTPI positions on the Bill, including a reference to Trudi Elliott’s evidence to the Bill committee;
- Discussion Document: National Planning Policy Framework (15 April);
- Budget 2011 Briefing (24 March);
- National Planning Policy Framework: Pre-consultation Phase – RTPI Initial Proposals (28 February);
- Proposed RTPI Amendment: Strategic Planning -Clause 90 (14 February). Decentralisation Minister, Greg Clark quoted extensively from it at the Select Committee and praised our involvement whilst speaking at the RTPI Planning Convention,
- Parliamentary Briefing: Commons' Second Reading of the Bill (11 January);
- Localism Bill: Briefing Paper (21 December 2010).
Pre-publication of the Bill - before 12 December 2010
- Twelve Tests for the Localism Bill (7 December 2010);
- Briefing Note: Local and Neighbourhood Planning System (10 December 2010);
- Localism Bill Brief: Great Expectations (24 November 2010);
- Briefing Note: Government Proposals for National Planning (4 August 2010);
- Briefing Note: Local Enterprise Partnerships (2 August 2010);
- Briefing Note: Announcements on Strategic Planning (8 July 2010).
Please note: the RTPI position on some issues has evolved as developments have occured. Early briefings may not represent the most upto date RTPI stance.
RTPI information and guidance
- Using the Costs Regime to Strengthen the Duty to Co-operate (8 June);
- Information Note: Existing Tools for Neighbourhood Planning, includes case studies (24 May);
- Information Page: Houses in Multiple Occupation (Updated 6 May);
- A Quick Guide to the Localism Bill: Neighbourhood Plans (1 June);
- Neighbourhood planning event resources (16 November)
- Introductory Guide: Localism Bill in Wales (20 January);
- Information Page: Changes to PPS3: Housing - Garden Land (22 November 2010);
- Archive Localism Bill: Latest Government Announcements (4 August).
key media responses
- Britain’s planners launch myth busting campaign to improve understanding of planning (6 September);
- RTPI Past Presidents letter to The Times and The Telegraph on their concerns about planning reform (1September);
- RTPI terms the draft National Planning Policy Statement (NPPF) a "missed opportunity" (25 July);
- In response to the 23 march Budget RTPI President, Richard Summers says Britain’s planners fear a ‘tin shed’ England within 10 years;
- Kelvin MacDonald, Chief Policy Advisor to the RTPI discusses key issues that remain to be resolved (Podcast 22 July).
- All RTPI media releases
- All RTPI consultation responses
Ongoing work
- We continue to be involved in discussions with Ministers and officials;
- RTPI is represented on the CLG Planning Sounding Board;
- We are working with a range of partners on the question of guidance;
- RTPI members are consulted through our Localism Bill Reference Group. Email your views to localismbill@rtpi.org.uk;
- We formally respond to Government consultations. See the list of open consultations and make a contribution;
- Check RTPI events calendar for details of all forthcoming events for members on the Localism Bill;
- Members are kept informed of our progress via special bulletins.
- Author:
- Sarah Lewis
- Publisher:
- The Royal Town Planning Institute
- Date:
- 17-Nov-11
- Categories:
- Policy, Practice, RTPI News
- Sections:
- News & Media , What Planning Does
This article has been read 80739 times.


Well, one good thing about the Presumption is that all the clauses relating to the Community Right to Buy are now redundant. The circumstances in which the Presumption will apply are just the same as those originally envisaged for Local Housing Trusts in Open Source Planning and Strong Foundations.
Communities who might want to use the Community Right are trying to respond to a need that has not been identified at a sufficiently local level in SHMA’s, or where no mainstream housing provider is willing or able to respond to the need..
When the Community Right to Build was formally launched this time last year, the Minister used Essendon, a village in his own constituency, as a place where the community wanted to build new homes but had been persistently blocked by the council. However, there is no evidence of any such housing proposal having been submitted for planning in the last 10 years. The planning records show only 3 outright refusals for single dwellings, because they were in the green belt, and over 30 new homes have been approved. The Essendon parish councillor Margaret Titchner was quoted by the BBC as saying that “The proposal was a good idea but it could cause friction in close-knit communities. I do foresee problems". A qualified welcome, it didn’t exactly sound as if it had been a burning issue.
The SHMA 2010 accepts that communities should identify housing need in smaller villages, and the wording in the current LDF Housing Consultation offers three options to build new housing in smaller villages “if supported locally and the local infrastructure could support it.” This is a standard approach. Even applications for villages in the Green Belt could be supported in exceptional circumstances. Policy 10 Herts County Structure Plan says “ In rural areas within the Green Belt such development [to support small scale affordable housing to meet local needs] should be within settlements.”
The Minister is having us on. There are perfectly good ways of providing housing to meet very localised needs and demands. Help communities with money, and technical assistance, by all means, but this is just the kind of expensive time consuming bureaucracy that I thought this government were against. Now they have published the draft Presumption, will they please take advantage of the opportunity for some much needed simplification and cost saving.