Continued uncertainty over
viability in planning is evidence that the Government must see the
Taylor Review through, said the Royal Town Planning Institute
(RTPI) in its response to the government consultation on the issue.
The RTPI, which represents 23,000 planners worldwide and is the
largest membership organisation of planners in Europe, also
welcomed the speed and comprehensiveness of the Taylor Review and
praised Ministers for commissioning the independent review
team.
Richard Blyth, RTPI's Head of Policy Practice and Research,
said: "We agree with much in the review and applaud DCLG for
commissioning it. Yet as the continued uncertainty over
adjudicating viability in planning demonstrates, the Government
needs to see the Taylor Review through. Government guidance could
cut through the Gordian knot of viability testing at a stroke."
Planning Inspectorate appeal APP/X0360/A/12/2179141 (Land at the
Manor, Shinfield) has been cited as an example of the
difficulties that can result from the uncertainty on viability
testing. Ultimately these issues are political issues and require a
political steer.
In its response, the RTPI also emphasised that the distinction
between Government planning guidance (which should be followed) and
what is best practice (which it might be good to follow), and that
Government guidance has an important role in delivering certainty
on matters of methodology. In addition to viability, the RTPI also
indicated a need for Government guidance on Strategic Housing
Market Assessments, Strategic Housing Land Availability
Assessments, the Duty to Cooperate, and flooding.